The study’s key findings included that women who reported negative mental images about vaccines – such as worrying scenarios of harm or side effects – also tended to report greater hesitancy towards the whooping cough and influenza vaccines, particularly if they had not yet been vaccinated.
This pattern was observed even after taking into account women’s general attitudes towards receiving government-recommended vaccines during pregnancy, suggesting mental images capture a unique aspect of how vaccine decisions are psychologically experienced, rather than simply reflecting general maternal vaccination attitudes.
When the researchers looked at what women actually did, a different pattern emerged. Those who reported positive mental images about vaccines, such as imagining antibodies being passed through the umbilical cord, were more likely to receive the whooping cough vaccine, and to get it earlier in their pregnancies.
This highlights the potential importance of positive mental imagery in vaccine decision-making and behaviour, such as being able to imagine how vaccines offer protection for oneself and one’s baby. Again, these effects were not simply a reflection of general maternal vaccination attitudes or disease-specific hesitancy levels.
By the end of their pregnancy, participants were most likely to receive the whooping cough vaccine (82.1% vaccinated), with lower uptake for influenza (60.1%) and very low uptake for COVID-19 (7.2%). At a time when hesitancy and suboptimal vaccine uptake pose significant threats to public health, the study highlights the importance of examining modifiable psychological factors involved in maternal vaccination decision-making.
The study builds on extensive work on the cognitive, emotional, and motivational impacts of mental imagery by leading mental imagery researchers at the Âé¶¹ÆÆ½â°æ.